From One Survivor to Another

reblogged: (via)
634 notes

August 23, 2011
thefremen:

ronworkman:

If you have children, take the time to explain to them why things like this, are a complex way of creating contrast and saying nigger without technically doing it. 
It isn’t simply the words: Obama’s Hip-Hop BBQ Didn’t Create Jobs that make it racist. Bush’s Country-Western cookout didn’t create jobs isn’t racist. It isn’t 4 black men pictured on the front page of Fox even though people like Tom Hanks were there and could have easily been included in the photo. It isn’t even the article itself. If you read it, it is a nice account of the event aside from an out of nowhere “The White House doesn’t create jobs.” quote in the middle of the article and a really shitty title. It isn’t even this “obama-parties-chris-rock-jay-z-and-whoopi-while-rome-burns” in the URL… actually that is pretty amazing. Am I the only person that caught that? 
Take time to explain to a child why the combination and context of these things can create a contrast in the brain of the reader (example). Intentional racism is easy for people to understand but, from my experience it is the unintentional and subliminal racism that is confusing for many people. Comments like “She’s pretty for a black girl” or when a security guard might not even be aware that he stares at a black teenager for even a second longer than a white teenager in a store without reason. Articles like this can further those problems. 
Be honest with them and help them to understand that it is a responsibility for them to take them time to recognize this, explain this to others and refuse to allow it.
Since you have them there, it wouldn’t be a bad idea to explain to them why this is horrible journalism even if it had no racial context at all.  

All of this. This reminds me: I never thought of this before but a non-white woman I know who is a professional dancer said that she was told by an instructor “You know, you’ll never *just* be a dancer, regardless of the company you’ll always have be a ______ dancer.”. 


wow at the ridiculousness of that URL. I thought the op was just kidding— nope.

thefremen:

ronworkman:

If you have children, take the time to explain to them why things like this, are a complex way of creating contrast and saying nigger without technically doing it. 

It isn’t simply the words: Obama’s Hip-Hop BBQ Didn’t Create Jobs that make it racist. Bush’s Country-Western cookout didn’t create jobs isn’t racist. It isn’t 4 black men pictured on the front page of Fox even though people like Tom Hanks were there and could have easily been included in the photo. It isn’t even the article itself. If you read it, it is a nice account of the event aside from an out of nowhere “The White House doesn’t create jobs.” quote in the middle of the article and a really shitty title. It isn’t even this “obama-parties-chris-rock-jay-z-and-whoopi-while-rome-burns” in the URL… actually that is pretty amazing. Am I the only person that caught that? 

Take time to explain to a child why the combination and context of these things can create a contrast in the brain of the reader (example). Intentional racism is easy for people to understand but, from my experience it is the unintentional and subliminal racism that is confusing for many people. Comments like “She’s pretty for a black girl” or when a security guard might not even be aware that he stares at a black teenager for even a second longer than a white teenager in a store without reason. Articles like this can further those problems. 

Be honest with them and help them to understand that it is a responsibility for them to take them time to recognize this, explain this to others and refuse to allow it.

Since you have them there, it wouldn’t be a bad idea to explain to them why this is horrible journalism even if it had no racial context at all.  

All of this. This reminds me: I never thought of this before but a non-white woman I know who is a professional dancer said that she was told by an instructor “You know, you’ll never *just* be a dancer, regardless of the company you’ll always have be a ______ dancer.”. 

wow at the ridiculousness of that URL. I thought the op was just kidding— nope.

(Source: ronworkman)

 
  1. thegoodlige reblogged this from ronworkman
  2. mosesparter reblogged this from marxist-feminism
  3. dressesandyarn reblogged this from tsarevich
  4. sancho108 reblogged this from justjasper
  5. melbaisamazing reblogged this from dirtyred357
  6. kicontradiction reblogged this from ndelphinus
  7. angryfeministbabe reblogged this from littlecatlady
  8. theclassiccomicbookvillain reblogged this from pandarican
  9. ndelphinus reblogged this from kicontradiction and added:
    This this this this this. Even if you live in a liberal area, even if your kids are confused by the idea of race...
  10. heisenbergsays reblogged this from empressfab
  11. richiedukes reblogged this from ronworkman
  12. atadam reblogged this from pandarican
  13. forrestbondurant reblogged this from empressfab
  14. insight2me reblogged this from pandarican
  15. amethystamore reblogged this from decodeunzipdiscover
  16. pandacup reblogged this from unbadger
  17. easyandretti reblogged this from theholykaron
  18. killerkhaleesi reblogged this from littlecatlady
  19. mrscody reblogged this from floodtheshore
  20. willthethird reblogged this from ronworkman
  21. teachmeyourtongues reblogged this from youcrashquimssaysfuckthepolice
  22. carolip reblogged this from littlecatlady
  23. mistressandry reblogged this from empressfab
  24. salingen reblogged this from littlecatlady
  25. littlecatlady reblogged this from lyndez
  26. lyndez reblogged this from merrymack and added:
    unff that commentary.
  27. merrymack reblogged this from tsarevich
  28. oftryingtimes reblogged this from itsoundslikehome
  29. around-thewaygirl reblogged this from itsoundslikehome